Project management. Every engineer seems to loathe the term and also what it describes. It has that word management in there. It's different than code. It's not code. So naturally whenever this comes up, all the engineers make a joke, shrug and go hide behind their editors. I've been there, I've done that. However over the years I have realized that this is not just stupid but actively working against making software projects successful. I mostly had an aversion against the overloaded, overused and useless definition of project management glorifying charts and plans and deadlines over actually organizing and making sense of the work and the processes to get it done. Because the truth is you are already doing project management. Yes you! The software engineer!
You had the project management all along
Every time you start to write code, even for some fun side project, you start to think about the different components that will make up the whole thing. You start to form a mental model of all the high level parts that comprise the finished application. You plan out some rough course of action for yourself. Which parts you want to tackle first. Which things to stub out and which things to punt on for later. You just (most of the time) don't write them down. But as you go on, you think about what the first workable version will be able to do. Then you think about the next one, maybe refactor some things to accomodate new features. Maybe you write down some notes for you or add some
//TODO: lines in the code so you know what to do when you come back to it. But the important part here is, that you're planning the application. You're basically already doing 85% of what project management for a small to medium software project is all about.
So what's the difference? Well really mostly thinking about the structure of your project on a higher level and writing things down. To be clear: It's ok if you only want to write code. And you can be or get really good at it. However only wanting to write code is like saying you only want to hammer wood together. Sure there is beauty in how you do it. There are good carpenters out there who are able to do woodwork like nobody else. And everybody wants to have such a craftsperson on their team when it comes down to doing the work. However this will only be useful up to a certain level. And that's absolutely ok. But if you want to level up as a carpenter you will need to understand what it is that you're actually building.
And that is very much the same for a software engineer. In my mind being a senior engineer also means that you understand the problems you are solving past the perfect implementation of a binary sort. That you understand that writing code is a means to an end and not the ultimate purpose. That you understand what problem you are solving and the environment it will exist in so you plan for it accordingly. This means a good chunk of "non-coding time". It means that you understand how to break the problem apart and how it would speed up the implementation if you suddenly got 2 or 3 more engineers on the project. Or if it wouldn't help at all. It means that you understand how the project could continue if you suddenly decided to go on vacation because you know you don't want to be a spof. It means that you have things planned out so someone else could take it over or even make the whole project happen without you. It means understanding what existing or future work would be great for a more junior engineer on the team to level up on and plan work so it's possible for them to do it. And it means writing things down and communicating them.
This can be as easy as creating a project in your JIRA instance and adding a bunch of subtasks. It can be Gantt charts if you are so inclined and want to show dependencies better. It can be a markdown document laying out all the bits and pieces you have thought about so far.
You are not your project
All of these things might feel weird at the beginning. All you want to do is write code, find the perfect abstraction, make it beautiful. You will suck at this at first because you are not used to it. But at the same time you will suddenly see others implementing things you want to exist, doing work for you and learning while they do it. And maybe even take a whole project over from you and finish it. And it will feel weird again. You will have this feeling of not having finished something. Of only going 80% there. Of only having done the "soft" parts. But in reality you just transferred a ton of knowledge. You made it possible for someone else to work on something that previously only existed in your head. You are not your projects. I've said before that you need to capture ideas for others to work on. It's the only way to scale yourself. And it frees up your time to work on other things. And even if you end up working on the project all by yourself (which is less and less likely as your organization grows), there will be a plan for others who are interested to follow along with what's going on. There is clear communication of what's in progress and what the current state of things is. And other engineers can learn from your example. Because suddenly you're doing project management. And it's not even that weird. You have been doing it on some level all along. And you should, it's part of your job. As an engineer you understand best how work gets done. So you are in the perfect position to plan out the structure of your projects. And there is no such thing as "no project management" anyways. You can only decide to do it badly or try to do it well. And seeing all the benefits of doing it well come to life is so much more fun.